I’ve been tinkering with the screener over the last few weeks and found it to be quite straightforward to use. In terms of coverage it extends to all major global markets in Europe, North America and Asia Pacific and over 22,000 stocks spanning all sectors. You can work with four different factors covering various elements of (i) valuation (e.g. multiples, various yields), (ii) quality (e.g. margins, returns), (iii) momentum, (iv) volatility and finally (v) growth (e.g. free cash flow or dividend).
Below is a sample screen I’ve selected for companies (i) trade in the US, (ii) market cap over $100m, and (iii) FCF yield up to 20%. Once you’ve done that you’ll get a list of companies, which you can tweak and sort as you like by many of the factors listed above. You can also set up your own templates to make your life easier. For geeks like me you also have the option to export it to Excel where you can live out some of your wildest fantasies with the list of companies.
In addition to the screener the website also has a list of quant strategies that Tim backtested and wrote about in a research paper (here and here). These strategies will consist of different valuation metrics coupled with other quality or momentum factors. The screener will allow you to search for stocks given a certain strategy’s criteria and build a portfolio of them over time. As noted above quant strategies can help your research and investment process but key is sticking to them over time even when they might not make sense.
Overall, I find the screener to be a very useful addition to my research process as it covers all the key elements in terms of valuation and other fundamental metrics that I use. The dataset is wide enough to have a great sample of global stocks to work with. While it won’t have the robustness of a Bloomberg terminal for instance you are also not paying $20k+ for the pleasure of financial data but you get many of the core features in the screener.
And now for the interview.
Tim, you are well known in the value investing community but for those who might be unfamiliar with your work could you tell us a bit about your background and how you came to value investing?
In 1986, shortly after finishing school, I enrolled in a stock market correspondence course. A year or so later I pooled my limited funds with an amount from my father and started to invest in the real world.
Made every investment mistake
I then went on to make nearly every investment mistake you can think of (technical analysis, broker recommendations etc) until I read a unknown 84 page book called “Winning on the JSE” by Karl Posel an engineer and former professor of applied mathematics.
This book was my introduction to value investing. It broke investing down into a logical process. The book also made me realise that investing was not a recent human activity and that there must be some good research and books about what has worked, not in the short term but over long periods of time in up and down markets.
So from about 1998 this is what I have done, studied the results of every possible book, research paper and investment study I could lay my hands on that showed superior long term performance – and I still do.
This of course led me to Graham, Buffett, Dreman, O'Shaughnessy, Greenblatt, Pabrai, Lynch, Piotroski, Antonacci etc.
All this research led me to develop my own unique investment approach that is value investing based.
I’ve known you for a few years and in that period you’ve gone from stock picking to a more quant based investing approach. What moved you to do it? What were some of the key lessons learnt along the way?
As I mentioned all the study and research I did made me a classic value investor.
Why I changed from pure value investing
This however changed when I read the outstanding book by Joel Greenblatt called The Little book that beats the market, where he introduced me to the Magic Formula. After finishing the book I started doing a lot more reading and research into quantitative investing and how it can be combined with value investing.
What works on European markets?
As part of my research a friend and I in 2012 set out to find the investment strategy that would have given you the best returns in the European markets over the 12 year period from June 1999 to June 2011.
As you know 1999 to 2011 was a horrible time to be an investor (not just in Europe) as it included both the bursting of the Internet bubble (2000) the financial crisis (2007 and 2008) as well as the European sovereign debt crisis (2010 to 2013). We called the study Quantitative Value Investing in Europe: What Works for Achieving Alpha.
Astounding returns +1157%
What we found astounded me, with the best performing strategy returning 1157% over the 12-year period.
In fact the top 10 strategies we found generated an average return of 881%, a return I’m sure you will also be proud of.
Valuation not the most important
The thing about the study that will surprise you (it surprised me) is that valuation was not the most important factor in any the best performing strategies.
Valuation was important but is not the first thing you should look at.
What was more important was to first look for companies with strong share price momentum and select the most undervalued companies from this list.
You may be asking if the research study changed me from classical value investor to a completely quantitative value investor.
A bit of both
The answer is I became a bit of both.
I still enjoy analysing companies and have of course remained a value investor but I make sure all of the ideas I analyse come from one of the best investment strategies in the research study as well as from continued research.
But I’ve also become a quantitative investor investing part of my portfolio in ideas that are quantitatively generated.
In terms of your investment process, how do you go about selecting ideas for your portfolio? Any bias towards certain geographies, industries, company size? What are your thoughts on portfolio composition, size limits, risk management etc?
I use the Quant Investing screener to generate ideas.
I may still look at an idea from a friend or fund manager I respect but that does not happen very often.
I am completely indifferent in terms of company size, location or industry. That said I prefer companies where there is enough volume traded daily for me to get in and out easily and I do not like to invest more than 20% of my portfolio in any one industry.
I size positions so that they make up a maximum of 4% of my portfolio when I buy. I keep the position as long as the company remains an attractive investment. When it becomes overvalued or is not on my screens after a year I sell.
If I invest quantitatively (buy a basket of companies with a high EBIT/EV for example) I do not put more than 2% of my portfolio in any one investment. This is because I have not done as much research on the companies.
A stop-loss limit?
Since 1987, when I started investing, I have been an on and off supporter of stop loss limits. This changed earlier this year when I sat down and researched all the research papers about stop-loss strategies I could find.
You can find the article here: Truths about stop-losses that nobody wants to believe
The conclusion of the research is, especially if you use momentum to get investment ideas, that a stop loss strategy adds a lot of value. With a trailing stop loss level of 15% to 20% giving the best results.
Because limiting losses helps you a lot with the psychological problems we face as investors, mainly the pain of losses, I recommend that you seriously consider implementing a stop loss system for your portfolio.
There are numerous studies on the outperformance of quant based value approaches, however key here is the limited interference of human actions in the process. How closely do you adhere to the recommendations of the tool to build a portfolio? Do you ever find yourself saying "there is no way this stock is going into the portfolio”?
That is a good question and something that is very hard to do.
If you get a list of company names from the screener and you do even the slightest amount of research, even if you just read the company names, it will lead to you changing in the investment process.
So you must either do no research at all or lay down strict rules about what exactly you want to research before you invest.
That said if you choose 20 investments from a list of 40 companies the screener generated based on your investment strategy that is also fine. If your strategy is good the investment ideas will give you a satisfactory return.
You can read about all the best investment strategies we have tested here: Best investment strategies
Could you tell us a bit about the idea behind Quant Investing? When did you start developing the tools, what are some of the core features and who do you see as your key audience? What are some of the new features that you are working on and planning to roll out in the future?
I am always looking for ideas and insights that can increase my investment returns. But to make sure that the ideas really work I needed a database to test ideas.
As I did not find anything that fit my needs (and budget) so I decided to build it myself. So that is how quant-investing was born.
This allows me maximum flexibility and the ability to try out all ideas I read about or think of.
I had to get a good data source, which you know is expensive, is why I make the screener available to other like-minded investors for a small monthly payment.
This does not mean the screener only has tools I use, I am always glad to include the ideas of subscribers to make the screener as useful as possible.
Reason for good strategies and data quality
Because I use the screener to invest my own money is the reason why subscribers can be sure the data quality as well as the performance of the investment strategies are good.
I eat my own cooking.
Useful for all kinds of investors
When we developed the screener we included ratios and indicators so that it can be used by as many different types of investors. Whether you are:
- Short term momentum,
- Smart Beta
- Net Net or
- Dividend investor
The screener will definitely be able to give you interesting investment ideas.
New developments - Large companies on steroids
We recently added a feature to the screener where you can select market leading companies, basically large companies on steroids. The idea comes from James O'Shaughnessy’s excellent book What Works on Wall Street.
We also just finished development of a valuation ranking system we called Q.i. Value that ranks companies based on a combination of the best valuation ratios we have tested including the work from the research paper Quantitative Value Investing in Europe: What Works for Achieving Alpha.
It ranks the whole universe of companies in the screener (22,000) using four valuation ratios and thus helps you to select the most undervalued companies. Q.i. Value is calculated with the following ratios indicators:
- EBITDA Yield
- Earnings Yield
- FCF Yield
- Liquidity (Q.i.)
You can find more information here:
What makes this screener stand out from other screeners?
The first thing you will notice when you use the screener are the four filters (or funnels) that allow you to select up to four ratios and then use a range slider (for each ratio separately) to choose the range of companies you want to include.
The image below gives you an example of how easy it is to screen using four filters (or funnels):
Over 83 ratios you can use
The four ratios mentioned above are just examples. The screener has more than 83 ratios and indicators you can use to search for companies that exactly meet your investment strategy. You can find a list of all ratios and indicators here: Glossary.
For those who are interested where can they find more information about the site and what’s the best way to reach you?
Here are the best places to look at on the website.
Information on the best investment strategies we have tested: Best strategies
The latest ideas we have researched and other interesting articles: Quant Investing Blog
Where you can find pricing information and sign up to get your own investment ideas: Join today
Your FREE guide to screening
If you click on the following link you can download a free guide, in simple to understand English, to help you make the most of any screener. To download your personal copy of the guide simply click the following link: Guide to screening
If you have any questions please feel free to email me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Any quant investing books that you enjoy reading and would recommend to others?
A really interesting book I read recently was Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Strategy for Higher Returns with Lower Risk by Gary Antonacci
Other good books you want to take a look at are:
The Little Book That Still Beats the Market by Joel Greenblatt
What Works on Wall Street by James O'Shaughnessy
Quantitative Value by Wesley Gray and Tobias Carlisle
Tim, anything you’d like to say in closing?
Each investor has his or her own unique approach to investing and that is a good thing else we will all be buying the exact same companies.
This is also the reason why we programmed the screener with over 83 ratios and indicators to ensure you find something that fits your investment strategy.
The idea with the screener is to allow you to, as easily as possible, find investment ideas that fit your investment style.
We test strategies all the time to give you an idea of what works and what not.
Please note we do not do this to change your investment style but just to help you with ideas to improve your returns.
And who does not want that.
Let me end on a more philosophical note.
Investing is not a difficult skill to master but it is more difficult than it looks.
If you are interested in investing your own money my best advice is to ignore the popular media completely. Read books and research studies by other investors that have been successful over long periods of time in up and down markets.
Learn from each of them but build your own investment strategy by taking the best from what you've learned that makes sense to you. Each person has got a different temperament and invests in a different way.
However if you follow time-tested investment strategies and build your investment strategy on what has worked you cannot do anything else but have outstanding returns over long periods of time.
P.s. If you are an investor, fund manager, analyst, fellow blogger etc and interested in having an interview posted on the site do drop me a message.
For the purpose of transparency, neither this blog nor me benefit financially from any of you choosing to sign up.