Tuesday, 14 October 2014

RexLot and the Chinese Lottery Market

I always had a fascination with lottery. Not that I ever played it but this type of gaming sits at the intersection of gambling and the state/government i.e. essentially promoted gambling. Which brings me to China. The only way to gamble (legally) in China is via lottery that is sponsored by the state while any other method is forbidden (though that doesn’t seem to stop people, more on this later). Of course you have Macau but technically speaking that’s outside of the country. Furthermore, judging by the effectiveness of the clamp down on corruption and indications of going after some junkets this might be under pressure going forward.

In the below I’ll talk a bit about the Chinese lottery market and a HK listed company called RexLot that I think is pretty interesting in this space.

Chinese lottery market
There are two types of lotteries in the country: welfare and sport lottery, which have been operational since 1987 and 1994, respectively. It is an important fundraising method for the government as 20-25% of gross lottery sales are used to fund welfare and sport activities. Under the current set-up the Ministry of Finance operates as the regulatory authority.

Source: China LotSynergy

The Chinese lottery market has grown 20%+ p.a. over the last decade and current sales are RMB 309bn (c. $50bn). On a relative basis, lottery spending per capita in China is US$27 vs Hong Kong and Japan of $125 and $93 and USA of $185. Given that legal gaming (ex-casinos) is far below other Asian countries (either per capita or % of GDP: China is less than 0.5% vs c. 1% in the region on avg) the government has an incentive to support growth of lottery for welfare and sports development funding.

Source: China lottery sales since 2009 (RMB bn). Ministry of Finance

Various estimates point to the fact that the “not so legal” gaming market in China is worth around RMB 1tn (c. $160bn) i.e. the majority of gaming is kept off books currently. To illustrate the magnitude, assuming that 5% of this moves to the legal side of things that’s 16% growth yoy. The government is spearheading efforts by going after these operators, enhancing the choice of games and increasing official payout ratios to attract more players.

In terms of the big picture, 57% of the lottery sales is related to welfare and 43% to sports lottery. The most popular game is computer ticket game (CTG, or the traditional lottery tickets) both in welfare and sports. These make up 68% of the total sales. The remaining consists of video lottery, single match sports games (SMG) and scratch cards.

CTG is the bread and butter and sales grew 20% p.a., most notably due to the introduction of high frequency games (i.e. draws happening daily or intra-daily). Scratch card sales declined since 2012 partly due to capacity constrained card printers and lack of new games. Capacity is expected to be limited through 2014, however this segment, while the most flexible, is still facing challenges vs CTG and online based games. SMG grew 50% p.a. since 2009 mostly supported by the introduction of new games and sports gambling will be one of the key driving force going forward. VLT is perhaps the closest to casino gaming (i.e. similar to a slot machine, potential for addiction etc), thus has the highest potential for regulatory changes. Indeed between 2008-2009 the MoF ceased operations to strengthen regulation

Source: 2013 Chinese lottery sales breakdown. Ministry of Finance

Looking at the distribution of economics in the sector (depending of different games) 50-69% of the sales are paid out to the players, 18-35% paid to the domestic lottery funds, 3-5% to cover costs of operating the lottery centres. The remaining 6-10% is allocated to lottery game and other service providers. The majority of service agreements between the government and lottery operators are for a 5-year period on average and based on an element of revenue sharing.

Internet lottery
Perhaps, the most important catalyst of the Chinese lottery market is moving online and to mobile as internet penetration increases and e-shopping becomes more widely accepted. In 2013, online sales made up around 5% of total lottery sales in China.

There are many specialised sites that operate online lottery such as 500.com (listed on the NASDAQ, currently the target of Muddy Waters) or Okooo (60% owned by RexLot). Besides the specialised sites, portals such as Taobao and Baidu also started offering games due to the increasing popularity. The key benefit for the specialised site operators is that they already have existing relationships with the government authorities and customers whereas the platforms do not have the operations set up with the lottery stores/government (they currently use RexLot’s or other competitors' systems on which the companies charge commission – the beauty of being a toll road owner…).

Now, the online lottery market is currently in a nascent stage and as such regulation is key. Operators have to meet certain regulations (registered capital, risk management etc) before they can be granted approval. The MoF is currently developing the regulation for the market. There is pilot regulation in place for sports lottery and of the private operators only 500.com has one.

The ministry is expected to issue licenses going forward to move online sales from this grey area, however this will take time (most have expected this to occur before the World Cup). The MoF is expected to give licenses to 2-3 operators per province.

For now to circumvent the fact that there are no licenses operators are moving to mobile, where regulation is relatively more lax. Furthermore, while online lottery sales do exist the back-end is linked to traditional paper-based lottery in co-operation with the provincial lottery centres but the aim is to move fully online.

I’ll not hammer on about the increase in Chinese consumer spending and how the government is pushing for this rebalancing (it’s all over the news). Growth in disposable income has slowed recently and while certainly there will be bumps in the road, in the long-term there is a positive tailwind from the structural change in the economy. It is worth noting that lottery sales are highly correlated with disposable income. Historically, the minimum face value lottery bets were RMB 2, thus geared towards the blue-collar market. With the increase in the sophistications of the games and platforms (mobile and internet gaming) the addressable market will certainly be growing.

Lottery market summary
To summarise (i) lottery will continue to be an important driver of raising money for welfare/sports spending, (ii) with the deeper penetration of mobile/internet the distribution channels are increasing as well as the number of games, (iii) government is clamping down on casinos/junket operators. While Macau is certainly more exciting than buying a lottery ticket, we can expect some migration of gaming RMBs to the legalised market, especially in sports betting. While growth rates historically have been 20-25%+ p.a., I’m expecting it to slow to around 10% p.a. in the mid to long-term (simply law of large numbers and penetration).

RexLot
The company is listed in Hong Kong and established a good track record in the Chinese lottery business mostly via M&A. RexLot has developed a vertically integrated lottery operation, with a very strong presence in the country and relations with the government. It is the clear market leader in a number of segments (e.g. welfare lottery) and well positioned to be a beneficiary of the currently nascent internet lottery market.

RexLot has the ability to distribute its games via their partners’ POS, lottery stores and increasingly mobile/internet. It is currently the largest lottery company in China. Barriers to entry are quite high, as operations require approval from the government (e.g. as noted above for internet operations), not to mention the existing customer base.

From 2009 sales grew from HK$1.2bn to HK$2.2bn in 2013 while net income grew from HK$0.4bn to HK$0.9bn. The company operates in two segments (i) System & Games Development and (ii) Distribution & Marketing. SGDB (essentially upstream) contributed 45% of revenue while DMB (downstream) makes up 65% in 2013.


Source: Key milestones. Company

Source: RexLot sales breakdown (2013). Company

Looking at the economics for the key segments: Welfare CTG, POS distribution, Internet and Mobile.

RexLot provides Welfare CTG systems (machines, system connections etc) to lottery centres in 17 provinces in China for a share of the revenue based on a 5-year contract on avg. This share has been as high as 1.8% back in 2010 but was lowered to 1% recently. The government is pushing down these rates and recently one of RexLot’s competitors agreed a rate at 0.65%. This is a huge drop in economics. In 2013, this market was worth c. HK$165bn, of which RexLot captured around 50%. Assuming a 1% rate on it gets you to HK$826m in sales, while lowering it to 0.65% results in a loss of c. HK$290m. This segment’s avg. EBITDA margin is between 70-75%.

RexLot’s POS distribution has an estimated market share of 30-35% with about 80k POS nationwide. On average the company has a 2.5% share of revenue with EBITDA margins of 70-75%. Retail channels include PetroChina, China Post etc as well as supermarkets and grocery stores.

RexLot owns 60% of Okooo.com, which it bought for c. HK$0.7bn (amongst other assets in a package deal) in 2011 and plans to buy the remaining portion as well (more on this below). This segment is about 20% of sales.

Lastly, mobile makes up 15% of revenues. Historically, SMS (text message) was the key driver, however as smartphones are becoming the norm this is migrating to the electronic lottery platform. EBITDA margin in this segment is between 60-70% and the company has c. 20m subscribers currently.

The company is controlled by Victor Chan (CEO of the company; finance and M&A background) who owns c. 14% and there are a few funds that own 5-10% positions.

Financials and valuation
The current share price is HK$0.8 market cap is HK$9.3bn while EV HK$8.7bn (company has been net cash since 2011). The company trades at 8x PE and 5x EBITDA, historically the multiples are 8.5x and 5.5x, respectively, which is quite modest for a company with leading market share.

As noted above the margins are high given the nature of the business. Net margin averaged 40% over the last five years. RexLot pays a dividend with a payout ratio of around 30% in 2013, which the company expects to raise to 50% in the mid-term.

The company runs a relatively conservative balance sheet, however to fund growth instead of raising debt they issue equity. In 2011/2012 the company diluted equity holders by about 25% by raising c. HK$1.4bn convertible bonds (maturing in 2016). Despite communication of more favourable shareholder treatment it issued another $1.9bn worth of convertibles in April 2014 (4.5% interest; maturing in 2019). Conversion price is HK$1.41 (vs current price of $HK0.8) resulting in an issuance of 1.3bn shares, assuming full conversion. In the company’s defence both capital raising rounds were for M&A, the most recent for the prospective acquisition of the remaining 40% of Okooo.com that they do not own. Mgmt communicates transaction close in late 2014.

I ran a DCF as I was curious how the market looks at the stock. Via some reverse engineering I think the market is valuing the stock excluding the internet business, which is fair to an extent. An internet business does exist (with the backend tied to the lottery centres), however no official licenses have been granted yet to move fully online. 

My key assumptions are 10% CAGR in Chinese lottery sales growth, reduction of the welfare CTG royalties from the current 1% to 0.5% over time and modest growth in internet and mobile platforms. Based on my assumptions (c. 7% p.a. EBIT/bottom line growth, which I think are pretty conservative) I get to a DCF value of HK$1.2-1.3 per share, excluding the internet business it’s HK$0.8-0.9 per share. There seems to be decent upside, subject to the official license, and even assuming no internet there is some protection on the downside.

Risks
  • Absolutely the key risk is changes in policy: e.g. change in the payout structure of contracts, revenue share percentages, regulation around introduction new games etc
  • The online licenses have not been granted, while RexLot operates its internet business as an extension of its SMG business (backend still based on traditional printed paper system). If the company doesn’t get a proper internet license and the government shuts this operation down this could have a substantial impact
  • In terms of macro, lottery spending is correlated with consumer spending and decline in a single year or years can impact revenues
  • Slower penetration of internet and mobile can slow down the rollout of the new games
  • On the company side, mgmt. has a good track record in M&A and growing the business but further potential dilution scares me

Sunday, 12 October 2014

Links

Documentary about the 1992 crash of the sterling

Manual of Ideas interview with Guy Spier

Buffett interviewed at Fortune's MPW forum

Panel discussion with Jim Chanos, amongst others, on gambling in Macau

Great TED talk on the impact of global remittances

Fast Company coverage on Chuck Feeney (founder of Duty Free Shoppers and the Atlantic Foundation). He took an uncommon approach (about 30 years ago) and decided to give his entire wealth away anonymously. Warren Buffett calls him the spiritual leader of the Giving Pledge. More on Chuck Feeney and his life here.

Outstanding Investor interview from 1989 with Walter Schloss and his son

Mark Mobius' most recent post on emerging markets

Fantastic interview with Arnold Van Den Berg, founder of Century Management (highly recommended to read)

Forbes article on Mohnish Pabrai

WSJ article on the emerging wealthy class in Myanmar

Tim Ferriss interviews Ed Catmulli on his podcast. He is the co-founder of Pixar and recently wrote a book titled Creativity, Inc.

Monday, 29 September 2014

Softbank

The most talked about event in financial news this month had to be the highly anticipated listing of Alibaba. Following the listing the stock went up to the low $90s (from the $68 IPO price), however their largest shareholder Softbank is down about 10% in the same period as people can now buy direct access to Alibaba.

In case you haven’t yet heard of Softbank, it’s a Telco, Internet and media holding company founded by a Korean-Japanese entrepreneur Masayoshi Son, who owns a 19% stake in the business. Softbank is listed in Japan while ADRs also trade on the NYSE. The market cap of Softbank is around $86bn (yes, it doesn’t fall into the usual small cap category but I cannot pass up on a mispricing).

To give you a sense of the background of Softbank, it was founded in 1981 as a software company in Japan. Son’s idea was to create a media ecosystem around the Internet and have various tentacles in certain sectors (Telco, e-commerce, software, gaming etc and now potentially movies – see P.s.).

Softbank has been very acquisitive under Son’s leadership and has been involved in publishing, IT distribution and so on. It was a large investor in Yahoo and eventually started a JV with the company (Yahoo Japan) in 1996. In 2000 it made an investment of $20m in Alibaba, which has to be one of the most remarkable investments in history (current stake value is around $72bn).

One of the most daring investments in corporate Japan had to be Son’s foray into mobile communication with the acquisition of Vodafone’s Japanese operations in 2006. With the initial substantial price-cutting it really upset status quo of the heavily concentrated Japanese wireless market. To note Son has always been an outsider in Japanese business, partly due to his Korean background, but certainly this step made him the least popular person that year in the industry. Interestingly, due to Son’s relationship with Steve Jobs Softbank was the first to sell iPhones/iPads in Japan.

He has proven to be a great capital allocator worthy of the Outsider CEO title, especially in the context of Japanese companies where returns have been largely subdued due to the convoluted corporate structures (keiretsu) and maintenance of status quo vs profits as the MO. All of the above resulted in a 16% compounded total return in Softbank’s share price and growth in book value.

Softbank’s current market cap is around $86bn and estimated NAV around $107bn ($36/ADR and NAV at $45/ADR) for 25% upside (to note I take a 30% tax on the equity investments, which is up for debate).

You can look at Softbank as the following (discussing major holdings):
  • Telco business (mobile, fixed, internet), which is expected to generate around $11-12bn in EBITDA in the next fiscal year. Assigning a 5x multiple (roughly in-line with comps) you get around $55-60bn EV
  • Investment in Alibaba – at current market it’s worth $72bn ($51bn post tax)
  • 80% stake in Sprint, which Softbank acquired in 2013, worth $20bn
  • 43% stake in Yahoo Japan, which is worth $9bn
  • HoldCo net debt (ex Sprint and Yahoo Japan) of $36bn

If you tot all the above up you get to around $107bn NAV (there are some other small investments as well) or a 25% upside from current. As noted above I assign a 30% tax rate on Alibaba based on a mix of ownership via Japanese and Singaporean subsidiaries. It’s questionable whether one should do it. Softbank said that they don’t expect to sell their holdings so in that case it’s irrelevant (they’ll likely use as collateral for acquisitions). However, if you want to stay on the conservative side you should. If you assume no tax you get to around 50% upside to NAV.

Holding companies are expected to trade at a discount especially if incompetent management runs them and to allow for some tax in the case of asset sale. While the holding structure is certainly a bit complex here that should not deter from the valuation much, as the management is very apt and generated strong returns to shareholders historically. Anybody ever looked at the holding structure of Berkshire with all the insurance companies in the web or John Malone’s alphabet soup of companies? Now that Alibaba is public and there is a public market-clearing price the stake becomes easier to value (though Alibaba’s fundamental value is worth another post for sure) as well as Softbank. I was expecting some volatility in Softbank as Alibaba was going public but as this quiets down we will be back to fundamentals.

Looking at Softbank another way; for the $86bn you get an Alibaba stake that’s worth $51bn (post tax), Yahoo Japan, Sprint and a few other companies for another $33bn, which means that the operating units are valued at $2bn. Last year they generated $11bn in EBITDA (there is about $36bn net debt against it). I’m no genius but this clearly doesn’t make sense.

It is possible that investors are pricing in a drop in Alibaba share price. Alibaba at current market cap makes up 48% of NAV (post tax). Now assuming that the valuation is very much stretched the company would have to see a 40% drop in share price to wipe off any upside in Softbank’s NAV. That would imply Alibaba market cap of around $130bn. If Alibaba falls 20%, roughly to the same valuation before it went public the upside narrows to 13%. If it’s a 30% drop ($160bn valuation) upside is 7%. Assuming, the valuation of the other assets don’t change there is protection on the downside.

Subject to Abenomics, currency movements could impact your investment. You can buy the shares in Japan and hedge the currency or just the ADRs in the US. I normally don’t worry about hedging FX as generally the results are mixed. Figuring out where stock prices will be in 6 months is a difficult enough job not to mention figuring out where currencies will be.

Some risks to consider are: Softbank is very acquisitive and there’ll bound to be failures in the process (currently they have 1,300 investments in a range of companies). Debt levels are very high as a result, though not unmanageable. Developments around Sprint in the US (competitive position, recent M&A news etc). Son is clearly eccentric and has a longer term time horizon than most investors (have you read his 30 year plan)? It’s very encouraging and I certainly prefer this approach but by and large the market doesn’t and there’ll be swings in the share price.

I highly recommend reading further about Softbank and Son. His career, approach to investing and track record are worthy of an Outsider CEO title
Book about him (it’s translated from Japanese so on occasions a bit hard to understand, nevertheless you get a really good picture of his story)


P.s. It was announced on Monday that Softbank is looking to buy Dreamworks at a c. 50% premium to the closing on Friday. Following the sell-off in Dreamworks earlier in the year I’ve been watching the stock with a potential to add to it. The deal is not done yet and there are some speculations whether it's actually going to happen. Some articles indicate that the discussions are not that serious or there could be other considerations, perhaps a JV between the two companies. Let's see.

Monday, 22 September 2014

Links of interest

Posting has been limited (almost non-existent) lately due to travel and other commitments. While new write-ups are in the process, below are some interesting articles/videos/interviews that I found over the last few weeks and thought were worthwhile to share.

Fireside chat with the Google co-founders

Excerpt from the Berkshire Beyond Buffett book

Article on Buffett and Benjamin Moore

Latest investor meeting transcript of the Sequioa Fund

Q&A with Guy Spear on his most recent book. More on the book here.

How "Focus Investing" can save your portfolio

Article and notes from Mungers Daily Journal annual shareholders' meeting

One of the best articles I've seen recently on human biases when it comes to investing

Interview with the author of Bling Dynasty, on the emerge of the luxury industry in China

More on luxury: Forbes article on Hermes

WSJ profile on Bill Gates' money manager

Saturday, 30 August 2014

About this blog and me

After a few write-ups I thought it was worthwhile to give some background, essentially an “about me” missive to shed some light as to how I came to value investing.

I was born in the CEE not too long before the one team, one dream idea of left-wing economic and political cohesion was in its last inning, so capitalism was an acquired taste for me. I got interested in business in high school and read every biography I could find on successful people to learn about their stories. I came across a few articles, then a few books on Buffett and via him I got an introduction to value investing, needless to say I was sold.

After high school I was fortunate enough to study abroad and spend semesters overseas working and studying. I was exposed to many ideas, experiences and people so those years had a tremendous impact on me. I’m very grateful for the people who made it possible and doors it has opened up. I also happened to have acquired a few three-letter qualifications but not one of them helped me make a single dollar in the markets. I believe that investing is "reps and sets" and you’ve to be innately curious; the more situations you see the better you become and not something you learn from textbooks. While he was in a different line of business, Biggie put these ideas very succinctly:

“Gotta try to stay above water y'know. Just stay busy, stay working. Puff told me like, the key to this joint, the key to staying on top of things is treat everything like it's your first project, nomsayin’. Like it's your first day, like back when you was an intern. Like, that's how you try to treat things like, just stay hungry.” - Notorious B.I.G interview sampled on Jay Z’s “My First Song”

I started investing while at university and have been at it since, with the last 4-5 professionally. My investment approach can be characterised as “go anywhere that’s cheap”, regardless of geographies and sectors, but with a bias towards smaller capitalisation companies.

I have a great interest in emerging markets but I’ll not beat up on the things you probably heard about the “emerging billions”, “consumers of the future” and so on. I certainly believe in the underlying trends, however you certainly have to pick your spots, as valuations are not as attractive as say 10-15 years ago. While I claim to have no special insight, I feel that I have a good understanding of the various fundamental drivers given my background as I experienced political and economic changes first hand.

In addition to EM, special situations always have a special place in my heart although from my experience by and large these occur in developed markets. Situations where there are natural/forced sellers such as large company spinning off a small subsidiary, operational/financial difficulties, bankruptcies and so on, create opportunities that attract me. What I like about these cases is that more often that not, you normally have to figure out two or three key factors to understand what causes the mispricing and develop a thesis. If you cannot you pass and go to the next one. As the price movement of these securities is reliant upon certain developments it’ll move less with the general market, which can be great. I do believe it’s important to keep a flexible approach and be able to invest successfully more than one way.

So what can you expect from this blog? A random selection of ideas that I think are interesting and 2-4 write ups a month as well as posts on articles/interviews/videos on investing and business that I think are worthwhile to share. Starting this blog will be a good way for me to keep track of some ideas and to organise my thinking as well as to develop a platform to share and discuss ideas with other like minded investors.

Weekend links

Barry Ritholtz interviews Jim Chanos

Annual letters of Blue Chip Stamps (1978-82) written by Charlie Munger

Barron's profile on Joel Greenblatt

Bloomberg profiles Byron Trott

1976 Buffett letter about GEICO

Great article about Irving Khan

What makes Warren Buffett a great investor?

Remember Hypo Bank of Austria?

A few articles on the coming IPO of Alibaba:

Profile on Joseph Tsai (Ma's right hand man)

Reuters article on Masayoshi San, Jack Ma and Jerry Yang

Monday, 18 August 2014

Links of interest

Joel Greenblatt on small cap stocks

NY Times article on Donald Graham and his plans post Washington Post

Collection of Seth Klarman links

Bill Ackman's 2014 Q2 letter to investors

Carl Icahn on the merits of activist investing

Nice summary on George Soros' investment approach

Peter Lynch speech on the US economy (video from 1994). Some parts are hilarious

Recent Larry Robbins interview (he is the founder of Glenview Capital)